Negativity drives "engagement" and harms thoughtful art discussion
Something I've been mulling on for a while is how a certain flavor of online media analysis has shaped how people engage with art- be it visual art, writing, film, etc- and it's seriously lowering the bar of discussion. Largely this type of discussion revolves around negative reactions to media without taking an in-depth look at themes or context and it is very arbitrary. In simple terms, a lot of this discussion comes to us in the format of "snark", a style of catty review that was popularized in the internet of the 00's and generally focuses on elements being inaccurate or just not up to the author's personal standards. While "snark" can be funny to some, it is a shallow way of approaching media and bases itself mostly on kneejerk off-the-cuff reactions. It adds very little to a person's understanding or appreciation of art. The next evolution of the "snark" style is the YouTube phenomenon of "reaction" videos, w...